Acculturation

pdf(en)
Published
February 16, 2023

Synopsis

DEFINITION OF THE TERM: The contemporary dynamics of intercultural relations require a far-reaching focus on acculturation, i.e., the cultural and psychological changes that result from these relations. Acculturation is a bilateral (or multilateral) process of cultural exchange involving cultural groups and their individual members. This process can lead to the transformation of various components of culture (ideas, values, customs, etc.). At the socio-psychological level, acculturation primarily concerns identity processes.

HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM: The phenomenon of acculturation gained prominence in colonial times, but it actually dates back to antiquity. Contemporary conceptualisations of acculturation emphasise that it is multifaceted and multilevel in nature as it encompasses intercultural processes, i.e., those happening when at least two cultures come into contact, and thus should be analysed at the level of individuals and ethnocultural collectivities.

DISCUSSION OF THE TERM: Literature provides a number of theoretical models of acculturation and its stages, with particular emphasis on the intrapsychic processes and contextual factors that affect acculturation and its consequences, including acculturative stress. However, the dominant concepts of acculturation seem limited, which hampers the development of further research.

SYSTEMATIC REFLECTION WITH CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Conclusions resulting from research findings and recommendations – both theoretical and practical – point to the need to develop better conceptualisations of acculturation, to use mixed methods of data collection, and to study collectivities rarely researched to date.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berry, J.W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. W: K.M. Chun, P. Balls Organista & G. Marín (red.), Acculturation. Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research, (s. 17–37). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Berry, J.W. (2004). Acculturation. W: Ch.D. Spielberger (red.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology, (s. 27–31). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.

Boski, P. (2022). Kulturowe ramy zachowań społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Demes, K.A., & Geeraert, N. (2015). The highs and lows of a cultural transition. A longitudinal analysis of sojourner stress and adaptation across 50 countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 316–337.

Gordon, M.M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kwiatkowska, A. (2019). Wielokulturowość w ujęciu interdyscyplinarnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Lysgaard, S. (1955). Adjustment in a foreign society. Norwegian Fullbright grantees visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin, 7, 45–51.

Nguyen, A.-M.D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and ­adjust­ment. A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 122–159.

Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock. Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177–182.

Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M.J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152.

Sam, D.L. (2006). Acculturation. Conceptual background and core components. W: D.L. Sam & J.W. Berry (red.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology, (s. 11–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schwartz, S.J., Unger, J.B., Zamboanga, B.L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist, 4, 237–251.

Ward, C. (2008). Thinking outside the Berry boxes. New perspectives on identity, acculturation and intercultural relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 105–114.

Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock. Hove: Routledge.

Ward, C., & Geeraert, N. (2016). Advancing acculturation theory and research. The acculturation process in its ecological context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 98–104.